hoose a country—any country—and you will likely find the same trends: Trust in public institutions is plummeting, wealth inequality is on the rise, and societies are increasingly polarized.
If nothing else, citizens of the world are united behind one grim truth: The status quo is failing us all.
That’s why the stakes for the UN’s Summit of the Future are high. Simultaneously hailed as a once–in–a–generation opportunity and criticized for being the right summit at the wrong time, this high level event in New York City is expected to produce not one, but three international frameworks: the Pact for the Future (currently available as a zero draft), the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration on Future Generations.
But what can the Summit deliver that will continue to resonate in five to 10 years? Some transformational proposals can easily be spotted in the working texts of each document. For example, the Emergency Platform, if approved, is likely to play a central role when triggered by the next global shock on the magnitude of the pandemic or the 2008 economic meltdown.
Other promising developments are more subtle, such as the opportunity to use the Summit as a platform for deepening the engagement of citizens in international cooperation. In its current draft, the Pact for the Future is less ambitious on this topic than the 2030 Agenda or the declaration that marked the UN’s 75th anniversary in 2020.
But as I, along with my co–authors, argue in a new challenge paper, Strengthening Citizen Participation in Global Governance, launched in partnership with Blue Smoke Alliance, the Iswe Foundation, Plataforma CIPÓ, and Southern Voice, there is still time for this to be fixed:
"The zero draft of the Pact promises 'a new beginning in international cooperation,' based on a foundation of renewed trust between people and the institutions that represent them.
But in a Pact that promises concrete action, there are as yet few practical commitments to increasing engagement. As negotiations continue, member states should take the opportunity provided by the Summit to support and invest in frameworks that take the active participation of citizens onto a new level.
Looking beyond the Summit, the UN’s 80th anniversary, the World Social Summit, the selection of the next Secretary–General, and the replacement of the 2030 Agenda present opportunities to entrench participation."
We the Peoples 2.0
Citizen engagement is not a new concern for the multilateral system. As its Charter proclaims, the UN was launched in the name of “We the Peoples” and made early attempts to understand what citizens needed from the new institution in the aftermath of World War II. The UN was also ahead of its time in the way it communicated with people about its role as a platform for global cooperation.
More recently, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were informed by a “global conversation” with over 1 million people, while the 75th anniversary of the UN (dubbed UN75) also explored what people want the international system to deliver.
This translated into commitments to engage citizens more effectively within the UN. In the 2030 Agenda, world leaders declared that the SDGs would be successful only if they were “of the people, by the people, and for the people.” They also promised to debate implementation of the UN75 commitments with their citizens as part of a more inclusive approach to multilateralism.
With half the world’s population under the age of 30, leaders have been especially keen to emphasize listening to and working with young people—inviting them, in the words of the 2030 Agenda, to “channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world.”
Avoiding the Seven Sins of Citizen Engagement
Unfortunately, citizen engagement is often poorly executed. In the challenge paper, we explore what happens when the international system reaches out to people in an ad hoc and unstrategic way, identifying what we call the seven sins of citizen participation. Engaging in tokenistic practices, asking questions that are too broad, not giving people a chance to deliberate, and resorting to “benign manipulation” that can push a process toward a preordained end are some of the most common missteps that undermine effective citizen engagement.
We also draw a contrast with the involvement of experts and the private sector. Not only are they engaged far more often (and with more generous budgets), but there has also been impressive institutional innovation to systematize their engagement. Think of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which has enabled scientists from around the world to inform climate policy, or the Global Compact, which Kofi Annan set up for businesses when he was UN Secretary–General.
At a time of deep crisis and growing polarization, my co–authors and I believe that this is a time for member states to be similarly ambitious in making people partners in the international system. As our challenge paper argues, structures to deepen engagement can build trust as well as inform more farsighted decision making.
The paper recommends ways in which the international system can get the basics right by using polling more strategically, mobilizing people behind global goals, and enabling a greater diversity of civil society organizations to play a full role in international forums.
But this is also a time for innovation, during a period when a deliberative wave has demonstrated new ways of allowing citizens to address complex challenges. Much of the experimentation has been at national and local levels, but the international system is beginning to catch up.
Take the first Global Citizens’ Assembly, which was held ahead of the UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow known as COP26 and brought together citizens from 49 countries selected by a lottery to ensure they were representative of the global population. UN Secretary–General António Guterres hailed this as “a practical way of showing how we can accelerate action through solidarity and people power.”
From Rhetoric to Reality: Establishing a Global Citizens’ Assembly
In the challenge paper, we argue that next time the Secretary–General or his successor brings together a high level panel or other expert body to advise on policy, he should ask a Global Citizens’ Assembly to explore the same set of questions.
For COP26, the core assembly was supported by discussions in community assemblies around the world. This offers a model for the UN’s 80th anniversary in 2025, building on and improving the global conversation held for UN75, and for the World Social Summit that is also planned for next year.
With time and investment, a permanent deliberative body could be established, providing a sustainable and legitimate voice for citizens in global governance. That is most likely to happen if the Pact for the Future strengthens the UN’s commitment to listening to and working with the world’s citizens—and promises to explore new and effective ways of facilitating engagement.
The Summit of the Future would then be remembered for helping to turn the rhetoric about inclusive multilateralism into reality.
Editor’s Note: This piece was originally published by the UN Foundation on 26 March 2024. This article refers to the Zero Draft of the Pact, since then there have been several rounds of revision. Republished with permission.
a global affairs media network
How the UN’s Summit of the Future could be a turning point for global diplomacy
Image via Adobe Stock.
September 18, 2024
If nothing else, citizens of the world are united behind one grim truth: The status quo is failing us all. That’s why the stakes for the UN’s Summit of the Future are high, writes David Steven.
C
hoose a country—any country—and you will likely find the same trends: Trust in public institutions is plummeting, wealth inequality is on the rise, and societies are increasingly polarized.
If nothing else, citizens of the world are united behind one grim truth: The status quo is failing us all.
That’s why the stakes for the UN’s Summit of the Future are high. Simultaneously hailed as a once–in–a–generation opportunity and criticized for being the right summit at the wrong time, this high level event in New York City is expected to produce not one, but three international frameworks: the Pact for the Future (currently available as a zero draft), the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration on Future Generations.
But what can the Summit deliver that will continue to resonate in five to 10 years? Some transformational proposals can easily be spotted in the working texts of each document. For example, the Emergency Platform, if approved, is likely to play a central role when triggered by the next global shock on the magnitude of the pandemic or the 2008 economic meltdown.
Other promising developments are more subtle, such as the opportunity to use the Summit as a platform for deepening the engagement of citizens in international cooperation. In its current draft, the Pact for the Future is less ambitious on this topic than the 2030 Agenda or the declaration that marked the UN’s 75th anniversary in 2020.
But as I, along with my co–authors, argue in a new challenge paper, Strengthening Citizen Participation in Global Governance, launched in partnership with Blue Smoke Alliance, the Iswe Foundation, Plataforma CIPÓ, and Southern Voice, there is still time for this to be fixed:
"The zero draft of the Pact promises 'a new beginning in international cooperation,' based on a foundation of renewed trust between people and the institutions that represent them.
But in a Pact that promises concrete action, there are as yet few practical commitments to increasing engagement. As negotiations continue, member states should take the opportunity provided by the Summit to support and invest in frameworks that take the active participation of citizens onto a new level.
Looking beyond the Summit, the UN’s 80th anniversary, the World Social Summit, the selection of the next Secretary–General, and the replacement of the 2030 Agenda present opportunities to entrench participation."
We the Peoples 2.0
Citizen engagement is not a new concern for the multilateral system. As its Charter proclaims, the UN was launched in the name of “We the Peoples” and made early attempts to understand what citizens needed from the new institution in the aftermath of World War II. The UN was also ahead of its time in the way it communicated with people about its role as a platform for global cooperation.
More recently, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were informed by a “global conversation” with over 1 million people, while the 75th anniversary of the UN (dubbed UN75) also explored what people want the international system to deliver.
This translated into commitments to engage citizens more effectively within the UN. In the 2030 Agenda, world leaders declared that the SDGs would be successful only if they were “of the people, by the people, and for the people.” They also promised to debate implementation of the UN75 commitments with their citizens as part of a more inclusive approach to multilateralism.
With half the world’s population under the age of 30, leaders have been especially keen to emphasize listening to and working with young people—inviting them, in the words of the 2030 Agenda, to “channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world.”
Avoiding the Seven Sins of Citizen Engagement
Unfortunately, citizen engagement is often poorly executed. In the challenge paper, we explore what happens when the international system reaches out to people in an ad hoc and unstrategic way, identifying what we call the seven sins of citizen participation. Engaging in tokenistic practices, asking questions that are too broad, not giving people a chance to deliberate, and resorting to “benign manipulation” that can push a process toward a preordained end are some of the most common missteps that undermine effective citizen engagement.
We also draw a contrast with the involvement of experts and the private sector. Not only are they engaged far more often (and with more generous budgets), but there has also been impressive institutional innovation to systematize their engagement. Think of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which has enabled scientists from around the world to inform climate policy, or the Global Compact, which Kofi Annan set up for businesses when he was UN Secretary–General.
At a time of deep crisis and growing polarization, my co–authors and I believe that this is a time for member states to be similarly ambitious in making people partners in the international system. As our challenge paper argues, structures to deepen engagement can build trust as well as inform more farsighted decision making.
The paper recommends ways in which the international system can get the basics right by using polling more strategically, mobilizing people behind global goals, and enabling a greater diversity of civil society organizations to play a full role in international forums.
But this is also a time for innovation, during a period when a deliberative wave has demonstrated new ways of allowing citizens to address complex challenges. Much of the experimentation has been at national and local levels, but the international system is beginning to catch up.
Take the first Global Citizens’ Assembly, which was held ahead of the UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow known as COP26 and brought together citizens from 49 countries selected by a lottery to ensure they were representative of the global population. UN Secretary–General António Guterres hailed this as “a practical way of showing how we can accelerate action through solidarity and people power.”
From Rhetoric to Reality: Establishing a Global Citizens’ Assembly
In the challenge paper, we argue that next time the Secretary–General or his successor brings together a high level panel or other expert body to advise on policy, he should ask a Global Citizens’ Assembly to explore the same set of questions.
For COP26, the core assembly was supported by discussions in community assemblies around the world. This offers a model for the UN’s 80th anniversary in 2025, building on and improving the global conversation held for UN75, and for the World Social Summit that is also planned for next year.
With time and investment, a permanent deliberative body could be established, providing a sustainable and legitimate voice for citizens in global governance. That is most likely to happen if the Pact for the Future strengthens the UN’s commitment to listening to and working with the world’s citizens—and promises to explore new and effective ways of facilitating engagement.
The Summit of the Future would then be remembered for helping to turn the rhetoric about inclusive multilateralism into reality.
Editor’s Note: This piece was originally published by the UN Foundation on 26 March 2024. This article refers to the Zero Draft of the Pact, since then there have been several rounds of revision. Republished with permission.
